Four seconds are damn fixed. You take to have accelerated BMW X 6 M and Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S from standstill to 100 km/h. That you must seem to believe it really, try maybe one or the other comparison. Is this: move to the goal in the World Cup final game lasted from Toni Kroos' pass over Schürrles Flanken running up to the shot at goal by Mario Götze 2014 twice as long: eight seconds. In these eight seconds X 6 M and GLE would quickly 63 S about 150 km/h, bludgeoned by a power forward, but thick and tired of rolling eight-cylinder turbo.
0 to 200 km/h in 15 Seconds
So far, so good, you trust that the readily, although faced with a not inconsiderable dormant mass Yes the torque force of their engines. Is each around the 2.3 tons, and since we have to be not petty because of the scarce Zester weight disadvantage of Mercedes: they weigh almost equally much. Oh, yes, we should not ask here better sense, that would be something for philosophy seminars or Monty Python movies. To hold remains in any case, that both models in the past sold well, there obviously is a need strong all cyclists with SUV traces after almost 600 HP.
Admittedly the least customers from Europe come, X6 / X5-M predecessor of series E71's were not more than ten per cent, the ML's likely looked similar to 63 AMG. The 15 seconds the two cyclists of all need, by the way, to 200 km/h to be quick, very nice proof that the physics knowledge is still valid: grow resistances in the square of the speed. It all feels remarkably unspectacular from the driver's seat, much to do there anyway: both it is enough to depress the gas pedal. From the perspective of Franz Meersdonk the handling course seems smaller and winkliger, the view would be from the driver's seat into the Rhine Valley, if not tougher fog over the A5 depended. With frightening acceleration both eat the short straight before the double lane change, then the anchor is thrown short.
Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S Thwarted by Electronics
Since the first differences already, those are indeed negligible in acceleration, half a second takes off the BMW X 6 M the Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S to 200 km/h. The BMW feels more stable on maximum delay, staggers less and also required the shorter braking distances. However, the test car runs here on optional 21-inch mixed tires (2,350 Euros), the AMG has the standard 295/35-21-rubber on it. The brakes from 100 km/h are both within the measurement tolerance. But when the delay from 200 km/h, after all, a situation which is entirely conceivable at high motorway speeds, required the X.
6 M Seven-Meter Less Up to The Stop
That doesn't sound like much, but the residual speed scams turn after all, around 40 km / h. in this theoretical case, works well, back on the gas, that goes better with the X6, it under steers hardly, however tends to be irritating pounding movements on the rear axle. Nevertheless, turns the BMW with weighty grace to the pylons. In such driving conditions, the driver in the GLE comes not so easily because the Assistant electronics very early and very noticeably a slows him. You very reliably prevents that the friction of the wheels in sliding friction is over, this is a shame, because the Mercedes might be quite more. So, its active-curve system with its active stabilizers prevents too pronounced rolling movements of the massive body. How well this works, shows about the comparison on the 36-meter slalom, there he is faster a touch 63 S. through as brother AMG CLS Still somewhat outrigger BMW sweeps by the way X 6 M, which is overall somewhat neutral and less to the under steer tends as the Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S.